After an
interesting and stimulating experience from Workshop #1 and Workshop #2, I was
thinking what direction I should go for my third workshop. While I could have
moved on to other ideas that still pertained to DNA, I was intrigued by the
“resistant” reaction from the first workshop that I could not let go of in
response to an image of DNA. In this vein, I wanted to focus on the idea of questions,
questioning science and questioning what we know vs. what we don’t know. Could
I gain a perspective into what provokes, inspires, intrigues us, and makes us
ask questions? Individually vs. in a group? What can dance/movement do to
provide questions and answers? Are we looking for specific answers? How can we
layer information? How can we make connections from what we already know?
As a central
part of my research, I also wanted to experiment with using dance and movement
as a potential way for individuals to get past feelings of “resistance” with
regards to science
So I began
to design a workshop in which I could take these questions and apply them to an
experience, which I had already encountered a sense of resistance – the images
from the first workshop. In what ways we can get over a “fear” response, and reflect
on how the most unknown is potentially the easiest to play with and use our
imagination, while the most recognizable might be the most challenging to work
with?
So I made a list of 8 questions, these
included:
Given the five images we worked with last
week,
1.
Is there an image that you find
beautiful? Why?
2.
Is there an image that you find
boring? Why?
3.
Is there an image that you find
frightening? Why?
4.
Is there an image that you find intriguing?
Why?
5.
Is there an image that you have
many questions about? Why? What questions?
6.
Is there an image that you find
inspiring? Why?
7.
Is there an image that you find
challenging? Why?
8.
Is there an image that you find
represents “science”? Why?
In giving
the dancers time to reflect and vocalize the answers to these questions, I
could look at how, as individuals, we look at images and perceive them. These
questions would be Part 1 of the workshop. Part 2 would then consist of having
the dancers single out an image that they are most resistant to. By “resistance,”
this could signify a reaction due to an image’s beauty, boring quality,
frightening quality, etc. However, I wanted to reiterate that this resistance should
emanate from a place where one finds discomfort rather than comfort. The
responses to these questions would be shared, then, as a group.
Part 3 of this
workshop would consist of taking the idea of resistance and overcoming it using
movement as a means to do so. Thinking back to how we learn and understand what
we don’t know based on what we do know, I thought about the concept of a map.
The map that everyone, in one way or another, is familiar with, would be the
foundation for translating the image into a series of directions as a way of
looking at something through a different perspective. When I had initially
thought of this idea, I thought of a map in three different ways: in terms of a
Google image map, from a bird’s eye view; a GPS directions-like system; or as a
grid-like image. By interpreting the image as a map, and translating that idea
into movement not only would the dancers be forced to interpret the image in a
different way, they also might think of a myriad of ways to think about the
benefits and advantages of a map and so create a wonderful variety of movement.
Originally, I had also wanted to repeat this exercise by looking at the
resistant image in terms of a musical score. However, upon further reflection I
thought about those who might have never encountered a musical score or understood
the intricacies of its purpose. So, I decided to stick only with the map idea.



No comments:
Post a Comment